The much-anticipated sequel to the 2006 film *The Devil Wears Prada* has sparked discussions about body diversity, yet early reactions suggest that the film may fall short of its promises. Despite Meryl Streep and Anne Hathaway’s enthusiasm for promoting inclusivity during the press tour, the film’s execution appears to rely on outdated humour that trivialises body image issues rather than addressing them substantively.
Promises of Inclusivity
During promotional events leading up to the film’s release, both Streep and Hathaway expressed their commitment to enhancing body representation in the fashion industry. Hathaway noted a shocking prevalence of “alarmingly thin models” at Milan Fashion Week, prompting her to advocate for a broader spectrum of body types in the sequel. Streep echoed this sentiment, asserting that their shared vision was to ensure the film would not perpetuate the “skeletal” standards that have long plagued the industry.
However, just 15 minutes into the film, the first weight-related joke emerges, casting doubt on the sincerity of the inclusivity claims. While the casting of comedian Caleb Hearon as Miranda Priestly’s assistant and a fleeting appearance by plus-size model Ashley Graham hint at progress, the overall approach appears more as a token gesture than a genuine commitment to body diversity.
A Return to Outdated Humour
The original *Devil Wears Prada* was released during a time when body shaming was prevalent, and the sequel seems to resurrect much of that same humour. The film’s quips about weight, while perhaps intended to be humorous, risk reinforcing harmful stereotypes. In an age where body positivity has gained traction, the reliance on fat jokes feels regressive.
Despite the strides made in recent years—such as the inclusion of plus-size models in mainstream fashion and the emergence of campaigns promoting body positivity—this sequel’s reliance on weight-related jokes undermines the progress achieved. The film’s narrative appears to echo the same old sentiments that once dominated the conversation about body image, rather than challenging them.
The Fashion Industry’s Contradictions
The fashion world has witnessed a significant shift towards inclusivity in recent years; however, reports indicate a troubling reversal. A March 2026 study by *Vogue Business* revealed that a staggering 97.6% of models featured in women’s collections were straight-size, with a mere 0.3% representing plus-size options. This regression suggests that despite societal calls for diversity, the fashion industry remains resistant to change.
Moreover, the increasing prevalence of weight-loss medications in Hollywood has further complicated the narrative surrounding body image. Originally designed for diabetes treatment, these drugs have been co-opted for weight loss, highlighting a troubling trend where achieving a certain body type supersedes genuine health considerations.
A Reflection on Progress
As the sequel unfolds, it becomes apparent that progress in body representation within the fashion industry and mainstream media may be more superficial than substantial. Hathaway’s character, Andy, references her past as the “former fat assistant,” mirroring the original film’s weight-centric dialogue. In a scene that paints a grim picture of understanding body positivity, Streep’s Miranda misinterprets the term, further signalling the disconnect between the film’s ambitions and its execution.
The film seems to affirm that 20 years on, the jokes about weight still resonate with audiences, yet this reflects far more about the stagnation of societal progress than any genuine comedic insight.
Why it Matters
The release of *The Devil Wears Prada 2* serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities surrounding body image in contemporary culture. In an era striving for inclusivity, the film’s reliance on outdated humour and minimal representation raises critical questions about the fashion industry’s commitment to genuine change. As society grapples with evolving ideals of beauty and health, it is imperative that media narratives reflect this progression, rather than revert to tired stereotypes. The missed opportunity for authentic representation in this sequel underscores the ongoing struggle for body positivity and inclusivity, leaving audiences to reconsider the true meaning of diversity in fashion and beyond.
