**
In a bold move that has sparked outrage among allies and trading partners, former President Donald Trump has unveiled a new set of tariffs affecting more than 80 countries. This decision comes as a replacement for a 10% global tariff that was set to expire, following a recent Supreme Court ruling that declared many of his earlier tariffs illegal. The latest tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, target key trading partners, including the UK, Canada, Mexico, Australia, China, and the entire European Union.
Fresh Tariffs and Legal Challenges
The announcement, made by US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, indicates that these new tariffs will be enforced under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which specifically addresses countries that engage in forced labour. Greer emphasised the importance of these tariffs, stating, “The United States has had a forced labour import ban for nearly a century, and rigorously enforces it; it’s well past time for our trading partners to do the same.” This statement reflects the administration’s continued focus on trade practices that it deems unfair.
The timing of these tariffs has raised eyebrows. The previous 10% tariff was initially imposed in February, shortly after the Supreme Court ruled against Trump’s authority to enact tariffs during peacetime. Following that ruling, Trump swiftly reinstated a different set of tariffs that were set to last only 150 days, which expired just as the new tariffs were announced.
International Backlash
The reaction from affected countries has been swift and critical. Australia and Brazil have condemned the tariffs as unjustified and are actively seeking their removal. Norway’s foreign minister echoed this sentiment, asserting there is no justification for the new measures. Meanwhile, Kaja Kallas, the EU’s foreign policy chief, expressed concern, stating the bloc would be seeking clarification from Washington. She highlighted that the EU had adhered to commitments made under a recent transatlantic trade agreement, viewing the new tariffs as a significant shock.
Canada, a vital trading partner to the United States, also responded promptly, asserting that it should not be a target of these tariffs given its leadership against forced labour practices. Matthew Holmes, executive vice-president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, remarked that if the goal is to combat forced labour, a coordinated multilateral approach would be more effective.
Domestic Implications and Consumer Sentiment
Trump’s administration has historically viewed tariffs as a primary instrument for protecting American jobs and reducing trade deficits. The former president has often referred to tariffs as “the most beautiful word in the dictionary.” However, the legal authority to impose such tariffs rests with Congress, and experts are questioning whether Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy is constitutionally sound. Alan Wolff, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, noted that these tariffs could represent a case of presidential overreach that might not withstand judicial scrutiny.
Public sentiment towards these tariffs appears largely negative. A Harris Poll conducted earlier this year revealed that 70% of Americans reported paying higher prices due to Trump’s tariffs. Even among Republican voters, 64% acknowledged that the tariffs resulted in increased costs for consumers, with 60% believing they had a negative overall impact.
The effects of rising energy prices and inflation—exacerbated by geopolitical tensions—are palpable, with overall inflation reaching a three-year high this May. Despite these challenges, Trump and his administration maintain that their trade policies have benefitted American consumers. During a recent Senate exchange, Greer insisted that inflationary pressures were not a result of the tariffs, asserting that core inflation had improved.
Why it Matters
The implications of these new tariffs extend far beyond trade relations; they resonate deeply within the American economy and its consumers. As prices continue to rise, the dissatisfaction among voters could pose significant challenges for Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections. The ongoing trade tensions and the administration’s approach to tariffs will likely influence not only international relations but also the economic landscape for American families, making this a pivotal moment in US trade policy.
