**
Former US President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that a peace agreement with Iran is nearing completion, following discussions with various Middle Eastern leaders and a mediator from Pakistan. This announcement, made via his social media platform, suggests a potential resolution to the ongoing conflict that has embroiled both the US and Israel since February.
Key Details of the Proposed Agreement
Trump stated that “final aspects and details” of a “Memorandum of Understanding” are being finalised, indicating that the critical shipping lane of the Strait of Hormuz will remain under Iranian control as part of the negotiation. He highlighted that the agreement has been “largely negotiated” with input from several nations, including Gulf allies, Israel, and Pakistan.
In a related development, a Pakistani source disclosed to Reuters that Iran and Pakistan had submitted an updated proposal to Washington to facilitate an end to hostilities and reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz. According to a regional official familiar with the negotiations, the potential deal includes a formal declaration ending the war, a two-month dialogue regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and a cessation of the US blockade on Iranian ports.
International Reactions and Ongoing Negotiations
The atmosphere surrounding Trump’s announcement has been charged, with ongoing threats from the former president to strike Iran should negotiations fail. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hinted during a recent visit to India that significant news could be forthcoming, despite the prevailing tensions.
In his post, Trump mentioned having had conversations with numerous leaders from the Middle East, including those from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain, as well as Turkey’s President Erdogan. He also communicated with Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, remarking that these discussions had been productive.
While the specifics of the negotiations remain somewhat elusive, Trump indicated that he had conferred with American negotiators, including special envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner. He underscored the need for an agreement that meets US demands fully, warning that failure to achieve this would result in renewed military action against Iran.
Iran’s Position and Concerns
Iran’s chief negotiator has asserted that the nation will not compromise on its fundamental rights, particularly concerning its nuclear programme. The Iranian leadership reportedly aims to draft a framework agreement comprising 14 clauses. Furthermore, Iran insists that the management of the Strait of Hormuz will remain firmly under its authority, countering Trump’s claims of imminent agreement.
Reports suggest that the proposed deal could result in the cessation of hostilities not only in Iran but also in Lebanon, potentially leading to the release of $25 billion in Iranian assets that have been frozen abroad. Negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear programme would occur within a timeframe of 30 to 60 days following the conclusion of the ceasefire.
The Iranian news agency Fars, closely associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, noted that Trump’s assertion regarding the imminent finalisation of an agreement diverges from reality. The agency further claimed control over the Strait of Hormuz would remain exclusively with Iran, contradicting any assumptions of shared management.
Republican Skepticism and Opposition
The prospect of a peace agreement has met with disapproval among certain Republican hawks who have long advocated for military intervention against Iran. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo condemned the proposed terms of the deal, characterising them as dangerously reminiscent of the 2015 nuclear agreement brokered during the Obama administration, which he had vehemently opposed.
Pompeo’s criticisms reflect a broader sentiment among some factions who view the potential accord as a capitulation to Iranian interests. He argued that the US should not only open the Strait but also take decisive action to diminish Iran’s military capabilities.
In response to Pompeo’s criticisms, former negotiator Robert Malley expressed that if the proposed deal could effectively terminate an “unlawful, unjustifiable war,” it would be preferable to the ongoing conflict and its associated devastation.
Why it Matters
The potential peace agreement between the US and Iran has significant implications for regional stability and global economic conditions. As tensions continue to rise, the outcome of these negotiations could reshape diplomatic relations in the Middle East, influence oil prices through the management of the Strait of Hormuz, and either alleviate or exacerbate the humanitarian crisis resulting from the ongoing conflict. With both sides entrenched in their positions, the ability to reach a sustainable resolution remains uncertain, but the stakes are undoubtedly high.
