In a significant move reflecting his continued support for fossil fuels, former President Donald Trump has issued a series of directives aimed at bolstering the United States’ oil, coal, and natural gas production. Citing a declared national energy emergency, Trump claims that the current energy supply is insufficient for national security, prompting a call for immediate action to expand domestic fossil fuel capabilities.
Expanding Domestic Production
On Monday, Trump unveiled several memos asserting that increased fossil fuel production is essential for “defense readiness.” His statements stem from an executive order he signed on 20 January 2025, which declared a national energy emergency. The memos indicate that inadequate energy resources pose a threat not only to the country’s industrial operations but also to its overall national security.
According to one memorandum, “Our Nation’s current inadequate and intermittent energy supply leaves us vulnerable to hostile foreign actors.” Trump emphasised that a robust domestic energy framework—comprising petroleum production, refining, and logistics—is crucial for maintaining the United States’ defence capabilities. He stated, “Petroleum fuels the Nation’s Armed Forces, industrial base, and crucial infrastructure. Without immediate Federal action, United States defense capabilities will remain vulnerable to disruption.”
Legislative Backing for Fossil Fuels
To expedite this agenda, Trump has directed the Secretary of Energy to take necessary measures, including financial commitments and project advancements, to facilitate fossil fuel production. His memos also reference the Defence Production Act, a Cold War-era law that empowers the president to bolster domestic supply chains essential for national security.
The former president’s approach is particularly noteworthy given the substantial financial backing he has received from the oil and gas industry, which contributed over £75 million to his campaign. His administration has consistently prioritised fossil fuel interests, rolling back regulatory measures, including vehicle emissions standards and restrictions on oil exploration in Alaska.
Rising Energy Costs Amid Global Tensions
The timing of Trump’s memos coincides with a period of rising gas prices, exacerbated by geopolitical tensions, particularly the recent conflict between the US and Iran. As oil markets fluctuate due to these developments, many Americans are feeling the pinch at the pump. Although there were temporary reductions in prices following diplomatic efforts, costs surged again after the US took control of an Iranian vessel.
This rise in energy prices is problematic for Trump, especially as he seeks to address voters’ concerns about affordability. Amidst growing living costs, the US Department of Agriculture predicts food prices will increase significantly in 2026, further straining household budgets.
Economic Implications for Americans
The broader economic context presents a challenging landscape for Trump, who previously campaigned on populist themes centred around affordability and economic stability. With gas prices on the rise, alongside escalating costs of living, his administration’s fossil fuel policies may come under scrutiny.
The USDA forecasts that food prices will rise by 3.6% this year, with specific increases of 3.1% for food at home and 3.9% for dining out. These figures surpass the historical average inflation rate, creating further economic pressures for American families.
Why it Matters
Trump’s renewed focus on fossil fuel production under the guise of national security raises critical questions about the balance between energy independence and environmental sustainability. As the global climate crisis intensifies, the implications of prioritising fossil fuels over renewable energy sources could have lasting repercussions for both the economy and the environment. This push not only risks locking the nation into a fossil fuel-dependent future but also diverts attention from the urgent need for a sustainable energy transition that addresses both national security and climate resilience.