Counter‑terrorism officers have charged two men with preparing a terrorist act against the Jewish community in Manchester, a development that has sent shockwaves through local residents and faith groups. Salam Ahmadyan, 36, from Liverpool, and Rahman Salehi, 34, from Salford, were formally charged on Friday, 2 October 2026, under Section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006. The pair, who are Iranian nationals, were arrested in Manchester on Sunday, 20 September 2026, and have been remanded in custody pending a court appearance at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, 3 October 2026.
Charges and arrests
The charges stem from a joint investigation by Counter‑Terrorism Policing (CTP) and regional forces, including Greater Manchester Police and Merseyside Police. Both men are alleged to have engaged in conduct intended to facilitate terrorism, a move that has been described by senior officials as a direct threat to the Jewish community. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood highlighted the case as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by both terrorist networks and foreign state actors, particularly Iran.
Alleged preparations and contacts
Prosecutors say the two men, who arrived in the UK via small boats in 2020 and 2023 respectively, were in contact with an overseas third party who may be based in Iran. The alleged plot included a series of steps that investigators have pieced together:
* Encrypted communications – The pair are said to have used secure messaging apps to exchange information about building a makeshift explosive device.
* Acquisition of a “steps for making (a) powder chlorine and car brake oil/fluid bomb” document – This detailed guide was reportedly obtained and studied.
* Video tutorials – Instructional footage on constructing improvised explosive devices was allegedly downloaded.
* Materials and components – Liquids, chemicals, and equipment needed for bomb‑making were reportedly gathered.
* Target research – Both men are accused of using the internet to identify and map potential sites, including locations within the Jewish community in Manchester.
* Reconnaissance – Surveillance of specific addresses, such as those on Epworth Street in Liverpool and Lancaster Road in Salford, formed part of the alleged planning.
Searches conducted at these addresses uncovered items of interest, leading investigators to believe the plot was at an advanced stage. The investigation also revealed that one of the men has been granted asylum, while the other’s claim is still pending.
Community response and security measures
The announcement has caused deep concern among Manchester’s Jewish residents, especially as it coincides with the High Holy Days and the first anniversary of the tragic attack on Heaton Park Synagogue. Community leaders have reported a surge in anxiety, with many fearing a repeat of past violence. In response, Greater Manchester Police have deployed additional officers to Jewish centres and increased visible patrols. Deputy Chief Constable Terry Woods emphasised that “robust policing plans” would remain in place, and that officers would continue to work closely with community organisations such as the Community Security Trust.
Counter‑Terrorism Policing has also issued specialist protective security advice to Jewish communities across the country. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Vicki Evans, Senior National Coordinator for CTP, stressed that while there is no ongoing threat to the public, vigilance remains essential. She noted the “wider context of increasing antisemitic incidents across the UK” and assured the public that intelligence agencies are using “the full range of capabilities” to guard against hostile acts, particularly those linked to Iran’s regime.
Legal proceedings and next steps
The two defendants will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, 3 October 2026, where they will face formal charges of preparing terrorist acts. Their case will be handled by the Counter‑Terrorism Division of the Crown Prosecution Service. Legal experts anticipate a complex trial, given the volume of digital evidence and the involvement of foreign elements. The court will decide on bail and further procedural matters at a later date.
Why it Matters
This case underscores the evolving nature of terrorist threats in the UK, where home‑grown concerns intersect with external influences, particularly from state‑backed actors like Iran. The alleged targeting of a religious minority during a period of profound spiritual significance highlights the vulnerability of minority communities and the urgent need for coordinated protection. Moreover, the involvement of individuals who entered the country via irregular migration routes raises questions about border security and integration policies. As the investigation continues, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of community‑police partnership, the necessity of robust counter‑terrorism resources, and the broader fight against antisemitism both domestically and abroad.
