**
The Trump administration has withdrawn its support for the Arctic Report Card, an essential annual overview of environmental changes in the Arctic region. This move, announced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), comes at a time when the Arctic is experiencing unprecedented warming—four times faster than the global average due to climate change. The decision raises alarm among scientists, who rely on this comprehensive report, first published in 2006, to track critical shifts in the Arctic’s climate, ecosystems, and overall health.
NOAA’s Announcement
On 9 August 2026, Kim Doster, NOAA’s communications director, confirmed the cessation of support for the Arctic Report Card, which has been a vital source of environmental data for both researchers and the public. Doster stated that “Coordination of the 2026 Arctic Report Card will not be facilitated through NOAA,” without providing a detailed explanation for this withdrawal. However, he assured that all data previously collected by NOAA would remain publicly accessible.
Despite this setback, Doster indicated that other NOAA initiatives would continue to support research in the Arctic, emphasising their importance to national security, weather forecasting, maritime safety, and the economic sustainability of coastal communities.
Implications of the Withdrawal
The Arctic Report Card has been instrumental in documenting significant environmental changes over the past two decades, including declines in sea ice, alterations in carbon sinks, and disruptions in local ecosystems. The most recent report highlighted that the average surface temperatures in the Arctic from October 2024 to September 2025 were the highest on record since 1900. Additionally, March 2025 saw the lowest extent of Arctic winter sea ice in a 47-year satellite tracking history.
This report also indicated that continuous glacier melt is contributing to rising global sea levels, which poses dire threats to Arctic communities through increased flooding and heightened risks of landslides and tsunamis. Furthermore, over the last decade, thawing permafrost has released iron and other elements, transforming rivers in over 200 Arctic Alaska watersheds into “rusting rivers,” which compromises water quality and aquatic habitats.
Scientists’ Reactions
Rick Thoman, the lead editor of the 2025 Arctic Report Card, expressed concern about the future of the report, stating, “We are scrambling to pull the pieces together. I am optimistic that we can find a path forward for 2027 and beyond.” He acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the viability of producing the 2026 report in light of the recent changes.
Twila Moon, another editor and a scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, remarked on the implications of the United States stepping back from federal leadership in Arctic science. “The US is an Arctic nation. It’s not just a distant place. It’s also our national place,” she noted, emphasising the wider impacts of Arctic changes on mid-latitude regions. Moon added that the absence of a federal effort to coordinate the report diminishes the United States’ standing in environmental science.
Former NOAA administrator Rick Spinrad condemned the decision as “really unconscionable,” arguing that the Arctic Report Card serves as a critical baseline for understanding ongoing changes in the region. He highlighted the report’s significance for infrastructure planning, particularly for Alaska’s vital industries, such as oil and fishing. Spinrad lamented that this withdrawal would complicate future efforts to access and analyse essential data.
The Broader Context
This withdrawal is part of a broader trend under the Trump administration, which has consistently rolled back support for climate science and environmental monitoring. In recent months, the administration has dismantled a key climate research centre in Colorado and attempted to eliminate critical ocean observation systems. These actions have raised significant concerns about the implications for public safety and environmental stewardship.
Why it Matters
The cessation of support for the Arctic Report Card signifies a troubling trend in U.S. policy towards climate science and environmental research. As the Arctic undergoes rapid changes that have global repercussions, the loss of a systematic and federally supported monitoring programme undermines not only scientific understanding but also the ability to make informed decisions regarding climate resilience and adaptation. This decision represents a step back from leadership in a field where the consequences of inaction could be catastrophic, affecting not just Arctic communities but the planet as a whole.