In a move that critics are branding as a prelude to authoritarianism, Uganda’s government is rushing through a controversial bill aimed at curbing foreign influence—a measure opposition leaders warn could silence dissent and cripple civil society. The proposed legislation, known as the Protection of Sovereignty Bill 2026, seeks to impose harsh penalties of up to 20 years in prison for promoting “foreign interests” and places stringent restrictions on organisations and individuals receiving external funding.
A Bill Under Fire
The bill is fast-tracked for parliamentary approval, with discussions expected to wrap up before the presidential inauguration scheduled for 12 May. Internal Affairs Minister Gen David Muhoozi defended the legislation during a parliamentary committee meeting on 23 April, asserting it is essential for safeguarding national security, economic stability, and social cohesion. However, critics argue that the bill resembles repressive laws employed by authoritarian regimes in Russia and China, designed specifically to undermine political opposition and restrict freedoms.
“This is a direct assault on Uganda’s multiparty system,” stated Joel Ssenyonyi, the leader of the opposition. “If passed, this law will suffocate legitimate political discourse and drive many into deeper poverty while simultaneously deterring foreign investment. It’s clear that the intent is to extinguish dissent.”
The Vague Language of Control
The bill’s vague terminology poses a threat to a broad spectrum of activities, potentially criminalising advocacy, journalism, and public dialogue. Earlier drafts even classified Ugandans abroad as “foreigners,” a designation that has since been removed following public backlash. Nonetheless, the bill still casts a wide net over those engaged in civil society work, stripping them of financial support and rendering them vulnerable to legal repercussions.
Asuman Kiyingi, a former minister and advocate, warned that the legislation would deal a severe blow to the right to protest. “This isn’t merely regulation; it’s a strategy to encircle dissent,” he stated. “The government has long weaponised the Public Order Management Act to suppress assembly, and now it
