**
The US Department of Justice has reportedly launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, a writer who secured a $5 million civil judgment against former President Donald Trump in 2023. This legal scrutiny emerges after a federal jury concluded that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll in 1996 and subsequently defamed her by denying the incident in 2022.
Investigative Focus on Perjury Allegations
According to unverified sources cited by CNN, the investigation centres on allegations that Carroll committed perjury in her testimonies during her two civil lawsuits against Trump. The first case involved accusations of sexual abuse in a department store dressing room, while the second pertained to defamation. Prosecutors are examining whether Carroll misrepresented her funding sources during a 2022 deposition, claiming she had received no external financial support for her legal battles.
In a turn of events, Carroll’s legal team disclosed just before the trial commenced that a nonprofit organisation, funded by Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, had indeed covered some of her legal expenses. Carroll’s representatives asserted that she had never interacted with anyone affiliated with that organisation. Consequently, Trump’s legal counsel, led by Alina Habba, was permitted to conduct a follow-up deposition of Carroll.
Documentary Highlights Carroll’s Case
The intricacies of Carroll’s depositions have recently gained public attention through a new documentary titled *Ask E. Jean*, which premiered last week in New York. The film features excerpts from her videotaped depositions with Habba, further illuminating the complexities surrounding her legal battles.
In the wake of the jury’s decision to award Carroll substantial damages, Trump has consistently sought to overturn these rulings. He is currently appealing the $5 million verdict related to the sexual abuse claim, as well as an $83 million judgement concerning the defamation case. Despite his efforts, a three-judge panel from a federal appeals court in New York dismissed Trump’s assertions that Carroll had lied during her deposition in 2024.
Judicial Support for Carroll’s Claims
The judges affirmed the original ruling against Trump, asserting on 30 December 2024 that Carroll had plausibly forgotten about the limited funding she received when questioned in 2022. Their opinion noted that Carroll had not communicated with her legal team about the funding for over two years, suggesting that her testimony was genuine and not intentionally misleading.
The investigation into Carroll’s testimony has been initiated by Andrew Boutros, the US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, who was appointed during Trump’s presidency. Notably, Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general who represented Trump in the Carroll case, has recused himself from the ongoing inquiry.
Ongoing Legal Complications for Boutros
Adding another layer to this saga, Boutros himself is currently under scrutiny. A defence attorney for an anti-ICE protester suggested in a Chicago federal court that Boutros had personal contact with the grand jury in a separate case, raising questions about his conduct.
Why it Matters
The unfolding investigation into E. Jean Carroll not only underscores the contentious nature of high-profile legal battles but also raises critical questions about the integrity of the judicial process. With Carroll’s previous victories against Trump now overshadowed by allegations of perjury, the potential ramifications could extend beyond the individuals involved, impacting public trust in the legal system and the perception of accountability among powerful figures. This situation serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in navigating justice within the political arena.