**
The US Department of Justice has launched a criminal inquiry into E Jean Carroll, the author who secured a significant civil victory against Donald Trump earlier this year. This investigation reportedly centres on allegations of perjury related to Carroll’s testimony during her lawsuits against the former president, further complicating an already contentious legal landscape.
Background of the Case
In May 2023, a federal jury awarded Carroll $5 million after concluding that Trump had sexually assaulted her in 1996 and subsequently defamed her in 2022 when he publicly denied the allegations. This civil judgement was a landmark moment in Carroll’s long fight for justice and drew considerable media attention. However, the recent developments suggest that the legal wrangling is far from over.
According to unnamed sources cited by CNN, the Justice Department’s current focus is on whether Carroll misled the court regarding funding for her legal expenses. Specifically, prosecutors are examining statements made by Carroll during her 2022 deposition, where she claimed she had not received any external financial support for her lawsuits.
New Revelations About Funding
The plot thickened nearly six months later, just before the trial commenced, when Carroll’s legal team disclosed to the court that a nonprofit organisation backed by Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, had indeed assisted in covering some of her legal costs. Despite Carroll’s assertion that she had no direct contact with the nonprofit, this revelation led to further scrutiny.
Subsequently, Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, was permitted to question Carroll again in a second deposition, where excerpts were later featured in the documentary *Ask E Jean*, released last week in New York. The film explores Carroll’s journey and the wider implications of her case against Trump.
Trump’s Legal Strategies and Appeals
Trump has continually sought to overturn the jury’s decision, appealing the $5 million judgment for sexual abuse as well as an $83 million defamation ruling. His legal team has made several attempts to dismiss the awards, indicating a robust strategy to undermine Carroll’s victories.
In a prior ruling from December 2024, a three-judge panel from a federal appeals court in New York had already dismissed claims that Carroll provided false testimony in her deposition. Their opinion noted that Carroll “plausibly represented” her memory lapse concerning the limited outside funding, asserting that she had not discussed the matter with her lawyers for over two years prior to her deposition.
Investigative Oversight and Implications
The investigation was initiated by Andrew Boutros, the US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, who was appointed during Trump’s presidency. This move raises questions about the motivations behind the inquiry, especially given that Boutros is currently facing scrutiny himself regarding potential misconduct in another case.
Todd Blanche, who served as acting attorney general and defended Trump during the Carroll litigation, has recused himself from this investigation. This step could indicate an attempt to maintain the integrity of the inquiry amidst ongoing allegations of impropriety within the Justice Department.
Why it Matters
The ramifications of this investigation extend beyond Carroll and Trump, reflecting broader themes of accountability and justice in high-profile cases of sexual misconduct. As legal proceedings continue, the intersection of politics and personal accountability remains a critical issue, highlighting the complexities of navigating justice in the public eye. The outcome of this inquiry could set significant precedents for future cases, potentially influencing how similar allegations are treated in the legal system.
