**
The United States Department of Justice has reportedly initiated a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the writer who recently secured a $5 million civil verdict against Donald Trump. This legal action stems from a jury’s conclusion that Trump sexually assaulted Carroll in 1996 and subsequently defamed her in 2022 by denying the allegations. According to sources cited by CNN, the investigation focuses on potential perjury related to Carroll’s testimony during her civil cases against Trump.
Investigation Details
The crux of the investigation revolves around claims that Carroll may have misled the court during a deposition in her civil lawsuits. These lawsuits include one concerning the alleged sexual assault in a department store dressing room in 1996 and another related to defamation. Prosecutors are particularly scrutinising Carroll’s assertion in a 2022 deposition that she had not received any external funding for her legal battles against Trump.
In a notable development, Carroll’s legal team informed the court just before the trial commenced that a nonprofit organisation, financed by Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn, had provided some financial support for her legal expenses. Carroll’s lawyers clarified that she had no direct communication with anyone from the nonprofit. Following this revelation, the judge permitted Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, to conduct another round of questioning with Carroll.
Legal Proceedings and Responses
Carroll’s legal victories have led to substantial financial awards, which Trump is currently appealing. He contests both the $5 million awarded for the sexual abuse ruling and an additional $83 million in the defamation case. Trump has persistently sought to have these verdicts overturned.
In a previous ruling, a three-judge panel from a federal appeals court in New York dismissed claims that Carroll had lied during her deposition. The judges stated that Carroll’s forgetfulness regarding the limited external funding was plausible, and that she had not been involved in the specifics of her litigation financing. Their opinion, delivered on 30 December 2024, maintained that Carroll’s lack of communication with her counsel about funding matters meant that she could have genuinely forgotten the details by the time of her deposition.
Current Legal Landscape
The investigation is reportedly being led by Andrew Boutros, the US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, who was appointed by Trump. Notably, Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general who previously defended Trump in the Carroll case, has recused himself from the investigation, as reported by both CNN and The New York Times. Boutros himself is under scrutiny following allegations that he had inappropriate contact with a grand jury in a separate case.
Carroll’s recent public appearances, including a screening of the documentary “Ask E Jean,” have kept her in the media spotlight, further complicating the narrative surrounding her legal battles with Trump. The documentary includes excerpts from her depositions, shedding light on her experiences and the issues at stake.
Why it Matters
This investigation not only highlights the complexities of legal battles surrounding high-profile figures but also raises questions about the integrity of judicial processes. As the investigation unfolds, it will be crucial to monitor its implications for both E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump, particularly in the context of ongoing discussions about accountability, justice, and the legal system’s ability to uphold truth in high-stakes cases. The outcome may set precedents for how similar cases are handled in the future, particularly in terms of funding disclosures and witness credibility.
