In a shocking turn of events, the Zambian government has abruptly cancelled the RightsCon 2026 conference—an influential gathering focused on human rights in the digital age—just days before its scheduled opening in Lusaka. Announced for 5-8 May, the summit was expected to draw over 2,600 participants, including activists, technologists, and policymakers, but officials have cited concerns that the event does not align with “national values.”
Government’s Abrupt Decision
Initially embraced by the Zambian administration, the RightsCon summit was positioned as a platform to address critical issues such as online hate, internet shutdowns, and the militarisation of technology. However, permanent secretary for the Ministry of Information and Media, Thabo Kawana, has now declared that the conference will not take place, stating that it is essential to ensure that such gatherings conform to Zambia’s national priorities and public interest.
The sudden cancellation has sparked outrage among human rights advocates, who view this as a blatant act of censorship and an alarming indicator of the government’s increasing repression of free speech and public discourse.
Concerns of Foreign Influence
Speculation is rife that external pressures may have influenced the government’s decision. Reports suggest that the presence of Taiwanese delegates at the conference, in a venue donated by China, could have prompted this unexpected move. This correlation has raised eyebrows, particularly given the current geopolitical tensions surrounding Taiwan and its international representation.
Linda Kasonde, a prominent Zambian lawyer and civil society advocate, expressed her dismay, stating, “This decision reflects a troubling trend of eroding rights and freedoms. The current administration, once a beacon of democracy and rule of law, is now slowly dismantling the very principles it was elected to uphold.” She pointed to the upcoming general elections in August 2026, suggesting that the government is implementing restrictive laws to fortify its grip on power.
Impact on Activists and the International Community
For many attendees, the cancellation represents not only a logistical nightmare but also a significant loss of opportunity. Delegates had already invested significant resources in preparing for the event. Karna Kone from Côte d’Ivoire described the financial burden of securing travel arrangements, stating, “This was more than just an event; it was a chance to connect with those who share our commitment to advancing human rights.”
The conference was set to be a critical venue for discussions on issues affecting vulnerable populations, including women and LGBTQ+ communities facing discrimination and violence. Chioma Agwuegbo, director of Nigeria’s TechHer, highlighted the importance of these dialogues: “At a time when civic space is shrinking across the continent, the cancellation of RightsCon is indicative of a broader trend of stifling dissent and dialogue.”
The Broader Implications
The fallout from this cancellation extends beyond Zambia’s borders, as it sets a precarious precedent for civil society gatherings in Africa. Sibongile Ndashe, a South African lawyer and human rights activist, warned, “If the cancellation of conferences becomes commonplace, it will progressively hinder the ability of rights groups to convene and advocate for the oppressed.”
This incident underscores a chilling reality: the constraints imposed on civil society not only silence important voices but also jeopardise the safety and dignity of those already marginalised, including sex workers and individuals seeking essential reproductive healthcare.
Why it Matters
The cancellation of RightsCon 2026 is emblematic of a troubling shift in Zambia’s political landscape and poses a grave threat to democratic values and human rights. As governments increasingly resort to censorship and repression, the ability to freely discuss and advocate for rights becomes more critical than ever. This incident serves as a wake-up call for the international community to remain vigilant in protecting civil liberties and to challenge authoritarianism wherever it arises.
