In a world where technology increasingly intertwines with art, a passionate group of zine creators is standing firm against the encroachment of artificial intelligence. They argue that the unique charm and scrappy essence of self-published zines are fundamentally at odds with AI’s sterile precision. Central to this movement is Rachel Goldfinger, a Philadelphia-based video editor and illustrator, whose anti-AI zine, *I Should Be Allowed to Think*, takes a bold stance against the tech that she believes threatens the very fabric of artistic expression.
Zines: A Cultural Cornerstone
Zines, those often hand-crafted booklets that have long been the voice of underground movements—from queer activism to punk culture—are now at a crossroads. Traditionally, these publications have celebrated the raw, unfiltered creativity of their authors, thriving on DIY ethics and personal narratives. Famous examples like *Sniffin’ Glue* and *Sweet-Thang* have paved the way for self-expression and community building.
However, the rise of AI has sparked a debate within this tight-knit community. Goldfinger articulates a widely shared concern: “AI is eliminating a lot of people’s ability to think critically for themselves.” She firmly believes that zines should remain a reflection of individual creativity, not a product of algorithms. The essence of zine-making lies in its handmade quality, and many creators feel that AI disrupts this authenticity.
Navigating the AI Landscape
While some zine makers are staunchly opposed to AI, others are experimenting with it as a tool. Jeremy Leslie, founder of the magazine retailer MagCulture, acknowledges the presence of AI in zine culture. He notes that those using AI often do so with a critical eye, employing the technology to highlight its limitations compared to human creativity. For instance, product designer Jesse Pimenta and writer Cheyce Batchelor recently crafted a 97-page zine infused with a 90s aesthetic using Figma’s AI tools. They praised the technology for its ability to streamline layout processes, allowing them to focus on content creation.
Steve Simkins, an IT engineer, also dipped his toes into the AI waters when he created an online photo zine. He utilised AI to assist with coding and website design, while he personally curated the content. “I viewed AI as a democratising software,” he explains, emphasising its potential to empower artists who may lack technical skills.
Voices of Resistance
Despite these explorations, a significant number of zine creators are rising up against AI’s influence. Maddie Marshall, a Melbourne-based video editor, dedicated a year to crafting her 92-page anti-AI zine, which she now offers on Etsy. Inspired by the pressure to conform to AI tools at work, she felt compelled to galvanise others into questioning the necessity of these technologies. “I want people to reflect on why these tools are being pushed upon us,” she shares.
Goldfinger echoes this sentiment with her zine, stating, “I don’t want to expedite the process. That ruins the point for me.” Her perspective underscores a broader movement among zine makers who prioritise the authenticity of their work over technological efficiency.
Ione Gamble, founder of the feminist zine *Polyester*, takes a firm stance as well. “We do not support the use of AI in any form,” she asserts, highlighting the importance of maintaining creative integrity. Zoe Thompson, creator of *Sweet-Thang*, a zine celebrating Black creatives, adds, “There’s something profound about taking time to create. AI strips that away.”
The Future of Zines in an AI World
As the debate rages on, the question remains: can zines and AI coexist? Gamble suggests that while AI is a reality, it might not find a harmonious place within the grassroots ethos of zine-making. “All you need is paper, a pen, and some collage materials,” she muses.
Simkins, reflecting on his earlier views, acknowledges the complexity of the issue. He now believes that AI can serve as a useful tool, but stresses that art must fundamentally be “made by people and for people.” The conversation about AI’s role in the creative process is crucial, as it shapes the future of artistic expression.
MagCulture’s Leslie maintains an open mind, stating that his interest lies in the innovation and engagement of zines, regardless of their origins. “If a zine created with AI captivates, we’ll support it,” he affirms.
Why it Matters
As technology continues to evolve, the clash between innovation and tradition poses significant questions for the future of creative expression. The zine community’s response to AI highlights a broader cultural struggle over authenticity, individual creativity, and the preservation of artistic integrity. In a landscape increasingly dominated by algorithms, the passionate voices of zine makers remind us of the enduring value of handmade art—one that resonates with the heart and soul of human experience. Their fight is not just about resisting AI; it’s about championing the unique power of creativity that cannot be replicated by machines.
